Update names to follow a new format

Naming Convention Updates - Complete Prompting Guide

Overview: Bring Order to the Naming Chaos

Inconsistent naming is like speaking different languages in the same office—it creates confusion, breaks automation, and makes reporting a nightmare. This guide teaches you how to use Colby AI to implement and enforce naming conventions that scale with your business.

What You'll Learn:

  • Why naming conventions multiply team efficiency

  • How to design standards that people actually follow

  • Bulk update strategies that preserve data integrity

  • Enforcement techniques that prevent regression

The Compound Cost of Naming Chaos

Poor naming conventions create cascading problems:

  1. Search Failures: Can't find what you're looking for

  2. Duplicate Creation: Same thing, different names

  3. Broken Automation: Rules fail on name variations

  4. Reporting Errors: Grouping and filtering break

  5. Integration Issues: Systems can't match records

Understanding Colby's Naming Intelligence

Colby brings order to chaos through:

  1. Pattern Recognition: Identifies naming variations

  2. Smart Standardization: Suggests optimal formats

  3. Bulk Updates: Executes mass corrections safely

  4. Validation Rules: Enforces standards going forward

  5. Exception Handling: Manages edge cases

  6. Impact Analysis: Shows what changes affect

The Master Naming Convention Framework

"Implement naming standards for [object type]:

Current State Analysis:

- Naming patterns in use

- Variation examples

- Volume by pattern

- Creation sources

Standard Definition:

- Format: [Exact structure]

- Components: [Required elements]

- Separators: [Delimiters used]

- Case: [Capitalization rules]

- Length: [Character limits]

Implementation Plan:

- Bulk update strategy

- Exception handling

- Validation rules

- User training

- Enforcement approach

Impact Assessment:

- Records affected

- Automations impacted

- Reports to update

- Integrations to test

- Training needed

Success Metrics:

- Compliance rate

- Error reduction

- Search improvement

- User adoption"


Naming Convention Examples: From Chaos to Consistency

❌ Poor Naming Update Request:

"Fix opportunity names"

Problems:

  • No standard defined

  • No scope specified

  • No plan provided

  • Likely to create more chaos

✅ Basic Naming Update Request:

"Update opportunity names to include company name and date"

Better Because:

  • Components specified

  • Clear direction

  • Still lacks detail

✅✅ Good Naming Update Request:

"Standardize opportunity names: [Company] - [Product] - [Month Year]. Update all open opportunities."

Much Better:

  • Exact format provided

  • Scope defined

  • Clear structure

✅✅✅ Exceptional Naming Update Request:

"Implement comprehensive opportunity naming convention:

Current Chaos Examples:

- 'Big Deal with ABC'

- 'ABC Corp/Software/2024'

- 'New Business - ABC - Q4'

- 'ABC renewal'

- '2024 ABC Corporation Expansion'

New Standard:

Format: [Account Name] - [Type] - [Product] - [Amount] - [Close Month Year]

Example: ABC Corp - New Business - Enterprise Plan - $50K - Dec 2024

Components:

- Account Name: Legal name from account record

- Type: New/Upsell/Renewal (picklist values)

- Product: Primary product family

- Amount: Rounded to nearest $1K

- Date: MMM YYYY format

Variations Allowed:

- Multi-product: Use 'Multi' + count in parentheses

- Unknown amount: Use 'TBD'

- Confidential: Use code names per security list

Implementation Phases:

Phase 1: Open Opportunities

- Week 1: Opportunities closing this quarter

- Week 2: All open opportunities

- Week 3: Recently closed (90 days)

Phase 2: Historical Data

- Month 2: Last fiscal year

- Month 3: Prior 2 years

- Archive older as-is

Automation Setup:

- Create naming formula

- Auto-populate on create

- Validation rule for manual entries

- Workflow for updates

- API enforcement

Exception Handling:

- M&A deals: Special format

- Government: Contract numbers

- Partners: Include partner name

- Global: Currency indicators

Training & Adoption:

- Quick reference card

- Email templates

- Team training sessions

- Compliance dashboard

- Monthly reviews"


Why This Is Exceptional:

  • Clear current state examples

  • Precise new standard

  • Thoughtful exception handling

  • Phased implementation

  • Automation to maintain standards

Mastering Different Naming Scenarios

1. Account Naming Standardization

Purpose: Consistent company identification Focus: Legal names and variations

Master Prompt:

"Standardize account naming conventions:

Current Variations:

- IBM vs International Business Machines

- ABC, Inc. vs ABC Inc vs ABC Incorporated

- McDonald's vs McDonalds

- AT&T vs AT & T vs ATT

Standardization Rules:

Legal Name Format:

- Use registered business name

- Include legal suffix (Inc., LLC, Ltd.)

- Preserve special characters (&, ')

- Proper capitalization

Common Variations:

- Store DBA in separate field

- Track common abbreviations

- Note regional differences

- Flag brand names

Special Cases:

- Government: Full department names

- Non-profits: Include designation

- International: Native + English

- Franchises: Location identifiers

Hierarchy Handling:

- Parent: Legal name only

- Divisions: Parent - Division

- Subsidiaries: Full legal name

- Locations: Name - City, State

Implementation:

- Data source verification

- Bulk update by confidence

- Manual review queue

- Ongoing maintenance

- Match prevention"


2. Campaign Naming Architecture

Purpose: Enable reporting and analysis Focus: Structured metadata

Master Prompt:

"Design campaign naming taxonomy:

Business Requirements:

- Channel identification

- Date/quarter tracking

- Product alignment

- Region/segment

- Performance tracking

Naming Structure:

[YYYY]_[Q#]_[Channel]_[Type]_[Product]_[Segment]_[Region]_[Version]

Components:

- YYYY: Fiscal year

- Q#: Quarter (Q1-Q4)

- Channel: Email/Web/Event/Social

- Type: Demand/Brand/Product/Partner

- Product: Product line code

- Segment: ENT/MM/SMB

- Region: NA/EMEA/APAC/LATAM

- Version: A/B for tests

Examples:

- 2024_Q4_Email_Demand_CRM_ENT_NA_A

- 2024_Q4_Event_Brand_ALL_MM_EMEA_A

- 2025_Q1_Web_Product_API_SMB_APAC_B

Benefits:

- Filterable reporting

- Period comparisons

- Channel performance

- Product attribution

- Regional analysis

Governance:

- Naming tool/generator

- Validation on save

- Quarterly review

- Exception process

- Training required"


3. Product Naming Modernization

Purpose: Support evolving product portfolio Focus: Scalable structure

Master Prompt:

"Modernize product naming for growth:

Current Problems:

- Legacy version numbers

- Inconsistent editions

- Regional variations

- Bundle confusion

- Feature sprawl

New Architecture:

[Product Family]_[Edition]_[Version]_[Deployment]

Structure:

Product Family:

- CRM (Customer Relationship Management)

- ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning)

- API (Integration Platform)

Edition:

- Starter/Professional/Enterprise

- Basic/Plus/Premium

- Core/Advanced/Ultimate

Version:

- Year-based (2024.1, 2024.2)

- Semantic (v3.2.1)

- Named releases (Phoenix, Quantum)

Deployment:

- Cloud/OnPrem/Hybrid

- SaaS/License/Subscription

Migration Map:

Old → New:

- 'CRM Pro v5' → 'CRM_Professional_2024.1_Cloud'

- 'Basic Package' → 'CRM_Starter_2024.1_SaaS'

- 'Enterprise Plus' → 'CRM_Enterprise_2024.1_Hybrid'

Bundle Handling:

- Parent bundle name

- Component list

- Discount structure

- Upgrade paths"


4. Document Naming Standards

Purpose: Enable findability and version control Focus: Metadata-rich naming

Master Prompt:

"Implement document naming standards:

Document Categories:

- Contracts

- Proposals

- Presentations

- Reports

- Communications

Naming Format:

[YYYY-MM-DD]_[Type]_[Account]_[Description]_[Version]

Components:

- Date: ISO format for sorting

- Type: Contract/Proposal/Preso/Report

- Account: Short name or code

- Description: Brief, no spaces

- Version: v1, v2, FINAL, SIGNED

Examples:

- 2024-11-15_Contract_ABCCorp_MSA_SIGNED

- 2024-11-14_Proposal_XYZInc_Security_v3

- 2024-11-13_Preso_Tech_QBR_FINAL

Special Rules:

- No special characters except dash/underscore

- 50 character maximum

- Use camelCase for descriptions

- Archive old versions

- Lock signed documents

Folder Structure:

/[Year]/[Quarter]/[Type]/[Account]/

Benefits:

- Chronological sorting

- Easy searching

- Version tracking

- Audit compliance

- Team consistency"


Advanced Naming Techniques

Technique 1: Smart Abbreviation Management

"Create intelligent abbreviation system:

Standard Abbreviations:

- Corporation → Corp

- International → Intl

- Technology → Tech

- Management → Mgmt

- Development → Dev

Industry-Specific:

- Manufacturing → Mfg

- Healthcare → HC

- Financial Services → FinServ

- Software as a Service → SaaS

Rules:

- Max 4-5 characters

- No periods

- Consistent case

- Document all

- Train users"


Technique 2: Naming Validation Automation

"Build naming enforcement:

Validation Rules:

- Format check on save

- Component verification

- Length limits

- Character restrictions

- Duplicate prevention

User Experience:

- Real-time format preview

- Dropdown selections

- Auto-population

- Error messages

- Suggestions

Monitoring:

- Compliance dashboard

- Exception reports

- Trend analysis

- User feedback

- Continuous improvement"


Technique 3: International Naming Support

"Handle global naming requirements:

Challenges:

- Character sets (Unicode)

- Right-to-left languages

- Cultural sensitivities

- Legal requirements

- Time zones

Solutions:

- UTF-8 encoding

- Parallel names (Local/English)

- Cultural training

- Legal review

- UTC timestamps

Implementation:

- System capabilities

- Display options

- Search functionality

- Reporting needs

- User preferences"


Common Naming Mistakes

Mistake 1: Over-Complex Standards

❌ 20-component naming schemes ✅ "5-7 meaningful components maximum"

Mistake 2: No Migration Plan

❌ Change everything immediately ✅ "Phase by priority, maintain old name reference"

Mistake 3: Ignoring Exceptions

❌ Force everything to fit ✅ "Design for 90%, handle 10% as exceptions"

Mistake 4: No Enforcement

❌ Hope people follow standards ✅ "Automate validation and generation"

Measuring Naming Success

Compliance Metrics:

  • Standard adherence rate

  • Error frequency

  • Time to find records

  • Duplicate creation rate

  • User satisfaction

Business Impact:

  • Search efficiency

  • Report accuracy

  • Integration success

  • Automation reliability

  • Training time

Pro Tips for Naming Excellence

  1. The Naming Generator Tool

  2. The Grandfather Clause

  3. The Living Standard

  4. The Training Investment

Explore other Prompting Guides

Search...

⌘K

The future is now

Your competitors are saving 30% of their time with Colby. Don't let them pull ahead.

Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved

The future is now

Your competitors are saving 30% of their time with Colby. Don't let them pull ahead.

Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved

The future is now

Your competitors are saving 30% of their time with Colby. Don't let them pull ahead.

Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved